Hartley v. Florida Department of Corrections

939 So. 2d 136, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 15053, 2006 WL 2588941
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 11, 2006·No. No. 1D05-4118·Published

Opinion

BROWNING, J.

The petition for writ of certiorari is denied on the merits. The petitioner has not met his extraordinary burden to show that the circuit court — acting in its appellate capacity in reviewing the petitioner’s challenge of an unfavorable institutional ruling after an inmate disciplinary hearing — violated a clearly established principle of law resulting in a gross miscarriage of justice. See Sheley v. Fla. Parole Comm’n, 703 So.2d 1202, 1206 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997), approved, 720 So.2d 216 (Fla.1998); Combs v. State, 436 So.2d 93, 95-96 (Fla.1983); Doss v. Fla. Dep’t of Corrs., 730 So.2d 316 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999).

PETITION DENIED.

BARFIELD and VAN NORTWICK, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hartley v. Florida Department of Corrections, 939 So. 2d 136, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 15053, 2006 WL 2588941 (Fla. Ct. App. 2006).

939 So. 2d 136 (Hartley v. Florida Department of Corrections) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Combs v. State
436 So. 2d 93 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1983)
Sheley v. FLORIDA PAROLE COM'N
703 So. 2d 1202 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1997)
Sheley v. Florida Parole Com'n
720 So. 2d 216 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1998)
Doss v. Florida Dept. of Corrections
730 So. 2d 316 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1999)