Hartley v. Blauvelt

208 Ill. App. 550
CourtAppellate Court of Illinois
DecidedOctober 16, 1917
DocketGen. No. 6,419
StatusPublished

This text of 208 Ill. App. 550 (Hartley v. Blauvelt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Court of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hartley v. Blauvelt, 208 Ill. App. 550 (Ill. Ct. App. 1917).

Opinion

Mr. Justice Dibell

delivered the opinion of the court.

2. Trial, § 200*—when direction of verdict in action of replevin is improper. Plaintiffs evidence that he and a certain party had agreed that upon such party paying plaintiff a certain amount and settling certain bills against plaintiff the latter would turn over to such party four mules, that thereafter such party said he had forgotten one item and that he would only pay plaintiff a certain lesser amount, in which change plaintiff refused to acquiesce; that such party .paid, nothing to plaintiff, but took the mules from the agister upon paying the latter’s fees, and removed them to defendant’s farm and later sold two of them, and that plaintiff brought an action of replevin after demand, held to make out a case for plaintiff, if true, and the direction of a verdict for defendant upon the latter’s evidence of a different agreement was erroneous, even though the court thought the defendant had the preponderance of the evidence.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
208 Ill. App. 550, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hartley-v-blauvelt-illappct-1917.