Hartley v. Atkins

Appellate Court of Illinois

Hartley v. Atkins

64 Ill. App. 502, 1896 Ill. App. LEXIS 949

Appellate Court of Illinois·Decided June 1, 1896·Published

Opinion

Mr. Presiding Justice Gary

delivered the opinion, of the Court.

The appellant filed a judgment creditor’s bill based upon the return of an execution, which return is as follows:

“ The within named defendant and no property of the within named defendant found in my county upon which to levy this writ. I therefore return the same, no property found and no part satisfied, this 25th day of March, A. ID. 1895, by order of plaintiff’s attorney.

James Pease, Sheriff,

by J. A. McCartney, Deputy.”

The opinion of Judge Shepard in Pecos Irrigation Co. v. Olson, 63 Ill. App. 313, leaves nothing for me to say in this case, except that the decree dismissing the bill is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mr. Presiding Justice Gary

delivered the opinion, of the Court.

The appellant filed a judgment creditor’s bill based upon the return of an execution, which return is as follows:

“ The within named defendant and no property of the within named defendant found in my county upon which to levy this writ. I therefore return the same, no property found and no part satisfied, this 25th day of March, A. ID. 1895, by order of plaintiff’s attorney.

James Pease, Sheriff,

by J. A. McCartney, Deputy.”

The opinion of Judge Shepard in Pecos Irrigation Co. v. Olson, 63 Ill. App. 313, leaves nothing for me to say in this case, except that the decree dismissing the bill is affirmed.

Hartley v. Atkins, 64 Ill. App. 502, 1896 Ill. App. LEXIS 949 (Ill. Ct. App. 1896).

Pincite

64 Ill. App. 502 (Hartley v. Atkins) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related