Hartless v. State

79 S.W.2d 1099, 1935 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 571
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedMarch 6, 1935
DocketNo. 17317
StatusPublished

This text of 79 S.W.2d 1099 (Hartless v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hartless v. State, 79 S.W.2d 1099, 1935 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 571 (Tex. 1935).

Opinion

MORROW, Presiding Judge.-

The unlawful possession of intoxicatingliq-uor for the purpose of sale is,-the, offense; [1100]*1100penalty assessed at confinement in the penitentiary for two years.

It is charged in the indictment that in the county of Cherokee and state of Texas the appellant unlawfully possessed for the purpose of sale “potable liquor containing in excess of 1 per cent, of alcohol by volume.”

The indictment contains no averment that Chérokee county was one in which the local’ option law forbidding the sale of the liquor described in the indictment was in effect. The principles controlling the decision against the state in the ease of Offield v. State (Tex. Cr. App.) 75 S.W.(2d) 882, control the present appeal.

The judgment is reversed and the prosecution Ordered dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Offield v. State
75 S.W.2d 882 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1934)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
79 S.W.2d 1099, 1935 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 571, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hartless-v-state-texcrimapp-1935.