Hartland Mgmt. Servs. v. Comm'r

2015 T.C. Memo. 37, 109 T.C.M. 1192, 2015 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 43
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Hartland Mgmt. Servs. v. Comm'r. Read the opinion of the Court — 109 T.C.M. 1040
United States Tax Court·Decided March 9, 2015·No. Docket Nos. 3275-13, 3279-13, 3610-13.·Unpublished

Opinion

, ET AL.,1 Petitioners v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent*
Hartland Mgmt. Servs. v. Comm'r
Docket Nos. 3275-13, 3279-13, 3610-13.
United States Tax Court
T.C. Memo 2015-37; 2015 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 43;
March 9, 2015, Filed
Hartland Mgmt. Servs. v. Comm'r, T.C. Memo 2015-8, 2015 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 20 (T.C., 2015)

Appropriate decisions will be entered.

*43Reggie L. Wegner, for petitioners.
George W. Bezold, for respondent.
COHEN, Judge.

COHEN
*38 SUPPLEMENTAL MEMORANDUM OPINION

COHEN, Judge: Our Memorandum Opinion, T.C. Memo. 2015-8, was filed January 12, 2015. On January 22, 2015, the parties filed a joint motion for reconsideration of findings or opinion pursuant to Rule 161, in which they reveal for the first time in the record that (1) the deficiencies, penalties, and interest for the taxable years ended May 31, 2010, and May 31, 2011, for Hartland Management Services, Inc., for the years 2009 and 2010 for Craig J. Kunkel and Kim M. Kunkel, and for the taxable years ended November 30, 2009, and November 30, 2010, for Integra Engineering, LTD, were assessed by the Internal Revenue Service and paid by petitioners, the latter having filed suits, still pending, with respect to those years in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin; and (2) after submitting this matter to this Court with respect to the period of limitations issue for earlier years, the parties reached an agreement that would result in a calculation of deficiencies different from those in the statutory notice for the earlier year for each petitioner.

We concluded in our Memorandum Opinion that petitioners had conceded*44 certain issues by failing to raise them. However, it now appears that the issues other than the period of limitations were not before the Court and that sustaining *39 the determinations in the statutory notice is contrary to the previously undisclosed agreement of the parties. Thus, all references to Hartland Management Services, Inc.'s 2010 and 2011 taxable years, Craig J. Kunkel and Kim M. Kunkel's 2009 and 2010 tax years, and Integra Engineering, LTD's 2009 and 2010 taxable years and their related deficiencies and penalties should be disregarded, and the decisions for the remaining years should be consistent with the agreement of the parties rather than decisions for respondent consistent with the statutory notices.

To reflect the foregoing,

Appropriate decisions will be entered.


Footnotes

  • 1. Cases of the following petitioners are consolidated herewith: Craig J. Kunkel and Kim M. Kunkel, docket No. 3279-13; and Integra Engineering, LTD, docket No. 3610-13.

  • *. This opinion supplements our previously filed opinion in Hartland Mgmt. Servs., Inc. v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 2015-8. All Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hartland Mgmt. Servs. v. Comm'r, 2015 T.C. Memo. 37, 109 T.C.M. 1192, 2015 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 43 (tax 2015).

2015 T.C. Memo. 37 (Hartland Mgmt. Servs. v. Comm'r) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hartland Mgmt. Servs. v. Comm'r
2015 T.C. Memo. 8 (U.S. Tax Court, 2015)