Harting v. Community Reformed Church of Colonie

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Harting v. Community Reformed Church of Colonie

198 A.D.2d 621, 603 N.Y.S.2d 637, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10534

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 10, 1993

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 198 A.D.2d 621 (Harting v. Community Reformed Church of Colonie) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Harting v. Community Reformed Church of Colonie, 198 A.D.2d 621, 603 N.Y.S.2d 637, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10534 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

Opinion

Mercure, J.

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court (Spain, J.), entered August 18, 1992 in Albany County, which granted defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Plaintiff, a player on a softball team sponsored by defendant in a church league, suffered the injuries forming the basis for this action when a weighted warm-up "doughnut” slipped off a teammate’s bat and struck plaintiff on the head. Supreme Court granted summary judgment in favor of defendant on the ground that the uncontroverted proof established defendant’s freedom from negligence in that it did not supervise or control the softball team and did not supply, purchase, store or make available the equipment involved in the accident, the "doughnut”. Plaintiff appeals.

We reverse. Defendant’s pastor, Bruce Cornwell, testified that the softball team was a sponsored program falling under [622]*622defendant’s lay ministries committee and that defendant made funds available to the team for the purchase of necessary equipment and published game results in the church bulletin. Philip Walrath testified that, as team manager, he was put in charge of selecting and purchasing equipment, either with funds supplied by defendant or collected from team members, and that defendant sometimes paid the team’s annual fee for participating in the church league. Notably, defendant satisfied an insurance requirement of the municipal owner of the team’s "home” park by furnishing a certificate showing that it had in effect a policy of liability insurance covering the team. In our view, the foregoing evidence raises a legitimate factual issue as to whether Walrath had actual or apparent authority to act on defendant’s behalf (see, Garcia v Herald Tribune Fresh Air Fund, 51 AD2d 897; see also, Fogel v Hertz Intl., 141 AD2d 375; Edwards v North Am. Van Lines, 129 AD2d 869).

As a final matter, we also agree with plaintiff that a factual question exists as to whether plaintiff assumed the risk that a worn batting "doughnut” would fly off the bat of an on-deck batter and strike him. Generally, a sports participant does not assume the risk of faulty equipment unless he or she knows of the defective condition and uses the equipment anyway (see, 6B Warren, Negligence in the New York Courts, Sports Participants, § 4, at 822 [3d ed]).

Weiss, P. J., Mikoll and Mahoney, JJ., concur. Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, and motion denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mercure, J.

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court (Spain, J.), entered August 18, 1992 in Albany County, which granted defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Plaintiff, a player on a softball team sponsored by defendant in a church league, suffered the injuries forming the basis for this action when a weighted warm-up "doughnut” slipped off a teammate’s bat and struck plaintiff on the head. Supreme Court granted summary judgment in favor of defendant on the ground that the uncontroverted proof established defendant’s freedom from negligence in that it did not supervise or control the softball team and did not supply, purchase, store or make available the equipment involved in the accident, the "doughnut”. Plaintiff appeals.

We reverse. Defendant’s pastor, Bruce Cornwell, testified that the softball team was a sponsored program falling under [622]*622defendant’s lay ministries committee and that defendant made funds available to the team for the purchase of necessary equipment and published game results in the church bulletin. Philip Walrath testified that, as team manager, he was put in charge of selecting and purchasing equipment, either with funds supplied by defendant or collected from team members, and that defendant sometimes paid the team’s annual fee for participating in the church league. Notably, defendant satisfied an insurance requirement of the municipal owner of the team’s "home” park by furnishing a certificate showing that it had in effect a policy of liability insurance covering the team. In our view, the foregoing evidence raises a legitimate factual issue as to whether Walrath had actual or apparent authority to act on defendant’s behalf (see, Garcia v Herald Tribune Fresh Air Fund, 51 AD2d 897; see also, Fogel v Hertz Intl., 141 AD2d 375; Edwards v North Am. Van Lines, 129 AD2d 869).

As a final matter, we also agree with plaintiff that a factual question exists as to whether plaintiff assumed the risk that a worn batting "doughnut” would fly off the bat of an on-deck batter and strike him. Generally, a sports participant does not assume the risk of faulty equipment unless he or she knows of the defective condition and uses the equipment anyway (see, 6B Warren, Negligence in the New York Courts, Sports Participants, § 4, at 822 [3d ed]).

Weiss, P. J., Mikoll and Mahoney, JJ., concur. Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, and motion denied.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

198 A.D.2d 621, 603 N.Y.S.2d 637, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10534, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harting-v-community-reformed-church-of-colonie-nyappdiv-1993.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack