Hartigan v. Zbaraz
481 U.S. 1008, 107 S. Ct. 1636
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Hartigan v. Zbaraz. Read the opinion of the Court — 484 U.S. 171 →
Opinion
C. A. 7th Cir. [Probable jurisdiction postponed, 479 U. S. 881.] The parties are directed to file supplemental briefs addressing the merits of the second question presented in appellants’ jurisdictional statement, as well as the question whether the Court of Appeals’ decision is sufficiently final to permit this Court to take jurisdiction over the case under 28 U. S. C. § 1254(2) to review both questions presented. Rule 35 of the Rules of this Court prescribes the time for filing these supplemental briefs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hartigan v. Zbaraz, 481 U.S. 1008, 107 S. Ct. 1636 (1987).
481 U.S. 1008 (Hartigan v. Zbaraz) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Courts of appeals; certiorari; certified questions
28 U.S.C. § 1254(2)