Hartigan v. Jordan
192 P. 1084, 184 Cal. 72, 1920 Cal. LEXIS 298
Opinion
[1] Petitioner's nomination papers under section 1188 of the Political Code were not presented to the *Page 73 registrar of the city and county of San Francisco for examination until September 25, 1920. This was not forty days prior to the general election of November 2, 1920. It results that he is not entitled to have his name go on the ballot. (Pol. Code, sec. 1188; Primary Law, sec. 5, [Stats. 1913, p. 1383].)
The application is denied.
All the Justices concurred.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hartigan v. Jordan, 192 P. 1084, 184 Cal. 72, 1920 Cal. LEXIS 298 (Cal. 1920).
192 P. 1084 (Hartigan v. Jordan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
McKesson v. Donaghue
147 P.2d 377 (California Supreme Court, 1944)