Hartigan v. Jordan

California Supreme Court

Hartigan v. Jordan

192 P. 1084, 184 Cal. 72, 1920 Cal. LEXIS 298

CourtCalifornia Supreme Court

DecidedOctober 11, 1920

DocketS. F. No. 9613.

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 192 P. 1084 (Hartigan v. Jordan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hartigan v. Jordan, 192 P. 1084, 184 Cal. 72, 1920 Cal. LEXIS 298 (Cal. 1920).

Pincite

Opinion

[1] Petitioner's nomination papers under section 1188 of the Political Code were not presented to the *Page 73 registrar of the city and county of San Francisco for examination until September 25, 1920. This was not forty days prior to the general election of November 2, 1920. It results that he is not entitled to have his name go on the ballot. (Pol. Code, sec. 1188; Primary Law, sec. 5, [Stats. 1913, p. 1383].)

The application is denied.

All the Justices concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[1] Petitioner's nomination papers under section 1188 of the Political Code were not presented to the *Page 73 registrar of the city and county of San Francisco for examination until September 25, 1920. This was not forty days prior to the general election of November 2, 1920. It results that he is not entitled to have his name go on the ballot. (Pol. Code, sec. 1188; Primary Law, sec. 5, [Stats. 1913, p. 1383].)

The application is denied.

All the Justices concurred.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

192 P. 1084, 184 Cal. 72, 1920 Cal. LEXIS 298, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hartigan-v-jordan-cal-1920.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack