Hartig v. Hartig
1954 OK 329, 277 P.2d 143, 1954 Okla. LEXIS 703
This text of 1954 OK 329 (Hartig v. Hartig) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Hartig v. Hartig, 1954 OK 329, 277 P.2d 143, 1954 Okla. LEXIS 703 (Okla. 1954).
Opinion
This is an appeal from an order granting a divorce. The final order .was entered November 5, 1953. The appeal was filed March 24, 1954. A motion to dismiss has been filed for the reason there was no written notice of appeal given as provided by 12 O.S.1951 § 1280. The motion to dismiss must be sustained. In Jupe v. Jupe, 196 Okl. 447, 166 P.2d 769 it is stated:
“Under 12 O.S.1941 § 1280, a written notice of appeal, duly entitled in the action, and filed with the clerk'of the court from which the appeal is sought to be taken within ten days after the overruling of motion for new trial, is a prerequisite to an appeal from a decree of, divorce.”
Appeal dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Jupe v. Jupe
1946 OK 10 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1946)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
1954 OK 329, 277 P.2d 143, 1954 Okla. LEXIS 703, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hartig-v-hartig-okla-1954.