Hartig v. Brooklands, Inc.
268 A.D. 869, 51 N.Y.S.2d 77, 1944 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3968
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 16, 1944·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
Action by plaintiff wife to recover damages for personal injuries, and by plaintiff husband for expenses and loss of services. Resettled order setting aside the verdict of a jury in favor of defendants and granting a new trial on the ground that the court had committed error in ruling upon evidence, to the prejudice of plaintiffs, unanimously affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Appeal from original order of January 7, 1944, dismissed, without costs. Present — Close, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Adel and Aldrich, JJ,
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hartig v. Brooklands, Inc., 268 A.D. 869, 51 N.Y.S.2d 77, 1944 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3968 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1944).
268 A.D. 869 (Hartig v. Brooklands, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Williams v. Alexander
285 A.D. 819 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1955)