Hartig v. Brooklands, Inc.
This text of 268 A.D. 869 (Hartig v. Brooklands, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Action by plaintiff wife to recover damages for personal injuries, and by plaintiff husband for expenses and loss of services. Resettled order setting aside the verdict of a jury in favor of defendants and granting a new trial on the ground that the court had committed error in ruling upon evidence, to the prejudice of plaintiffs, unanimously affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Appeal from original order of January 7, 1944, dismissed, without costs. Present — Close, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Adel and Aldrich, JJ,
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
268 A.D. 869, 51 N.Y.S.2d 77, 1944 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3968, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hartig-v-brooklands-inc-nyappdiv-1944.