Harth v. Druggan

96 Ohio St. (N.S.) 588
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedApril 3, 1917
DocketNo. 15381
StatusPublished

This text of 96 Ohio St. (N.S.) 588 (Harth v. Druggan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Harth v. Druggan, 96 Ohio St. (N.S.) 588 (Ohio 1917).

Opinion

Judgment affirmed on authority of Bauman v. Kiskadden, Trustee, 94 Ohio St., 130.

Judgment affirmed.

Newman, Jones, Matthias, Johnson and Donahue, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bauman v. Kiskadden
113 N.E. 588 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1916)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
96 Ohio St. (N.S.) 588, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harth-v-druggan-ohio-1917.