Hartford v. Coöperative Mutual Homestead Co.
130 Mass. 447, 1881 Mass. LEXIS 129
Opinion
This case is governed by Gaverly v. Bushee, 1 Allen, 292. After the defendant filed its declaration in set-off, both parties were actors, the plaintiff to establish his claim declared on, and the defendant to establish its claim in set-off. The result of the case is that neither party has succeeded in proving his claim, and neither is entitled to costs as the prevailing party. Lapham v. Norris, 10 Cush. 312.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hartford v. Coöperative Mutual Homestead Co., 130 Mass. 447, 1881 Mass. LEXIS 129 (Mass. 1881).
130 Mass. 447 (Hartford v. Coöperative Mutual Homestead Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Stahl v. Erie Delivery Co.
31 Pa. D. & C. 429 (Jefferson County Court of Common Pleas, 1937)
Checketts v. Collings
1 P.2d 950 (Utah Supreme Court, 1931)
Nevada Northern Railway Co. v. Ninth Judicial District Court
273 P. 177 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1929)
Ballard Transfer & Storage Co. v. St. Paul City Railway Co.
152 N.W. 868 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1915)