Hartford Underwriters Insurance Co. v. Nicholson

Missouri Court of Appeals

Hartford Underwriters Insurance Co. v. Nicholson

217 S.W.3d 922

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided April 3, 2007·No. No. WD 66869·Published

Opinion

[923] Order

PER CURIAM.

Harold Nicholson appeals the award of damages as to an insured property after the property was partially damaged in a fire.

Having carefully considered the contentions on appeal, we find no grounds for reversing the decision. Publication of a formal opinion would not serve jurisprudential purposes or add to understanding of existing law. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[923] Order

PER CURIAM.

Harold Nicholson appeals the award of damages as to an insured property after the property was partially damaged in a fire.

Having carefully considered the contentions on appeal, we find no grounds for reversing the decision. Publication of a formal opinion would not serve jurisprudential purposes or add to understanding of existing law. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Hartford Underwriters Insurance Co. v. Nicholson, 217 S.W.3d 922 (Mo. Ct. App. 2007).

Pincite

217 S.W.3d 922 (Hartford Underwriters Insurance Co. v. Nicholson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.