Hartford Spinning, Inc. v. United States
48 Cust. Ct. 468
United States Customs Court·Decided May 28, 1962·No. No. 66808; protests 267996-K, etc. (Ogdensburg)·Published
Opinion
Opinion by
In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of waste composed of synthetic materials, not eo nomine specified in the tariff act, and following the principles set forth in United States v. Steinberg Bros. (47 C.C.P.A. 47, C.A.D. 727), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hartford Spinning, Inc. v. United States, 48 Cust. Ct. 468 (cusc 1962).
48 Cust. Ct. 468 (Hartford Spinning, Inc. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
United States v. Steinberg Bros.
47 C.C.P.A. 47 (Customs and Patent Appeals, 1959)