Hartford Spinning, Inc. v. United States
48 Cust. Ct. 468
CourtUnited States Customs Court
DecidedMay 28, 1962
DocketNo. 66808; protests 267996-K, etc. (Ogdensburg)
StatusPublished
This text of 48 Cust. Ct. 468 (Hartford Spinning, Inc. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Hartford Spinning, Inc. v. United States, 48 Cust. Ct. 468 (cusc 1962).
Opinion
Opinion by
In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of waste composed of synthetic materials, not eo nomine specified in the tariff act, and following the principles set forth in United States v. Steinberg Bros. (47 C.C.P.A. 47, C.A.D. 727), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
United States v. Steinberg Bros.
47 C.C.P.A. 47 (Customs and Patent Appeals, 1959)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
48 Cust. Ct. 468, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hartford-spinning-inc-v-united-states-cusc-1962.