Hartford Rubber Works Co. v. Consolidated Rubber Tire Co.

117 F. 1008, 1902 U.S. App. LEXIS 5169

Opinion

KIRKPATRICK, District Judge.

The bill of complaint in this cause is substantially the same as that of India Rubber Co. v. Same Defendant, 117 Fed. 354, and the relief sought of the same character, being money damages for contracts broken. The cases were heard together. For reasons given in the case above referred to, judgment must be for the defendant on demurrer, and the bill dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hartford Rubber Works Co. v. Consolidated Rubber Tire Co., 117 F. 1008, 1902 U.S. App. LEXIS 5169 (circtdnj 1902).

117 F. 1008 (Hartford Rubber Works Co. v. Consolidated Rubber Tire Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

India Rubber Co. v. Consolidated Rubber Tire Co.
117 F. 354 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of New Jersey, 1902)