Home/U.S. Circuit Court for the District of New Jersey/Hartford Rubber Works Co. v. Consolidated Rubber Tire Co.

Hartford Rubber Works Co. v. Consolidated Rubber Tire Co.

117 F. 1008, 1902 U.S. App. LEXIS 5169
CourtU.S. Circuit Court for the District of New Jersey
DecidedMay 8, 1902
StatusPublished

This text of 117 F. 1008 (Hartford Rubber Works Co. v. Consolidated Rubber Tire Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hartford Rubber Works Co. v. Consolidated Rubber Tire Co., 117 F. 1008, 1902 U.S. App. LEXIS 5169 (circtdnj 1902).

Opinion

KIRKPATRICK, District Judge.

The bill of complaint in this cause is substantially the same as that of India Rubber Co. v. Same Defendant, 117 Fed. 354, and the relief sought of the same character, being money damages for contracts broken. The cases were heard together. For reasons given in the case above referred to, judgment must be for the defendant on demurrer, and the bill dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

India Rubber Co. v. Consolidated Rubber Tire Co.
117 F. 354 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of New Jersey, 1902)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
117 F. 1008, 1902 U.S. App. LEXIS 5169, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hartford-rubber-works-co-v-consolidated-rubber-tire-co-circtdnj-1902.