Hartford National Bank & Trust Co v. Griswold

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Hartford National Bank & Trust Co v. Griswold

409 A.2d 1027, 176 Conn. 578, 1979 Conn. LEXIS 682

DecidedFebruary 6, 1979

StatusPublished

This text of 409 A.2d 1027 (Hartford National Bank & Trust Co v. Griswold) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hartford National Bank & Trust Co v. Griswold, 409 A.2d 1027, 176 Conn. 578, 1979 Conn. LEXIS 682 (Colo. 1979).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Because of our ruling in Society for Savings v. Chestnut Estates, Inc., 176 Conn. 563, 409 A.2d 1020 (1979) we do not address the errors assigned in this case. We find error in the judgment on the authority of Society for Savings, which found General Statutes §49-14 to be unconstitutional.

There is error, the judgment is set aside and the case is remanded with direction to render judgment for the defendant Gerald Gelles.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Because of our ruling in Society for Savings v. Chestnut Estates, Inc., 176 Conn. 563, 409 A.2d 1020 (1979) we do not address the errors assigned in this case. We find error in the judgment on the authority of Society for Savings, which found General Statutes §49-14 to be unconstitutional.

There is error, the judgment is set aside and the case is remanded with direction to render judgment for the defendant Gerald Gelles.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

409 A.2d 1027, 176 Conn. 578, 1979 Conn. LEXIS 682, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hartford-national-bank-trust-co-v-griswold-conn-1979.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack