Hartford National Bank & Trust Co v. Griswold
409 A.2d 1027, 176 Conn. 578, 1979 Conn. LEXIS 682
Opinion
Because of our ruling in Society for Savings v. Chestnut Estates, Inc., 176 Conn. 563, 409 A.2d 1020 (1979) we do not address the errors assigned in this case. We find error in the judgment on the authority of Society for Savings, which found General Statutes §49-14 to be unconstitutional.
There is error, the judgment is set aside and the case is remanded with direction to render judgment for the defendant Gerald Gelles.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hartford National Bank & Trust Co v. Griswold, 409 A.2d 1027, 176 Conn. 578, 1979 Conn. LEXIS 682 (Colo. 1979).
409 A.2d 1027 (Hartford National Bank & Trust Co v. Griswold) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Society for Savings v. Chestnut Estates, Inc.
409 A.2d 1020 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1979)