Hartford Life & Accident Insurance v. Henricksen (In re Henricksen)

185 Fed. Appx. 561, 185 F. App'x 561, 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 15830, 2006 WL 1697006
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
DecidedJune 21, 2006
DocketNo. 05-2639
StatusPublished

This text of 185 Fed. Appx. 561 (Hartford Life & Accident Insurance v. Henricksen (In re Henricksen)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hartford Life & Accident Insurance v. Henricksen (In re Henricksen), 185 Fed. Appx. 561, 185 F. App'x 561, 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 15830, 2006 WL 1697006 (8th Cir. 2006).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Debtor Stanley Henricksen (Henricksen) appeals the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel’s (BAP’s) denial of his Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b) motion. We hold the BAP did not abuse its discretion in denying Henricksen’s Rule 60(b) motion. See In re Kirwan, 164 F.3d 1175, 1177 (8th Cir.1999) (standard review). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
185 Fed. Appx. 561, 185 F. App'x 561, 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 15830, 2006 WL 1697006, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hartford-life-accident-insurance-v-henricksen-in-re-henricksen-ca8-2006.