Hartford Life & Accident Insurance v. Henricksen (In re Henricksen)

185 Fed. Appx. 561, 185 F. App'x 561, 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 15830, 2006 WL 1697006
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit·Decided June 21, 2006·No. No. 05-2639·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Debtor Stanley Henricksen (Henricksen) appeals the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel’s (BAP’s) denial of his Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b) motion. We hold the BAP did not abuse its discretion in denying Henricksen’s Rule 60(b) motion. See In re Kirwan, 164 F.3d 1175, 1177 (8th Cir.1999) (standard review). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hartford Life & Accident Insurance v. Henricksen (In re Henricksen), 185 Fed. Appx. 561, 185 F. App'x 561, 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 15830, 2006 WL 1697006 (8th Cir. 2006).

185 Fed. Appx. 561 (Hartford Life & Accident Insurance v. Henricksen (In re Henricksen)) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related