Hartford Insurance Co. v. Granowski
This text of 530 So. 2d 448 (Hartford Insurance Co. v. Granowski) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We reverse and remand with directions that this case be reinstated in the trial court. Because both parties seek to waive any rights they have under the arbitration provisions of their insurance contract we need not resolve the issue as to the binding effect of the arbitration provisions which have been upheld by the second district in Arnica Mutual Insur. Co. v. Roe, 515 So. 2d 1370 (Fla. 2d DCA 1987), and disapproved by the third district in Berger v. Fireman’s Fund Insur. Co., 515 So.2d 997 (Fla. 3d DCA), rev. dismissed, 519 So.2d 987 (Fla.1987).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
530 So. 2d 448, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 2066, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 3836, 1988 WL 89194, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hartford-insurance-co-v-granowski-fladistctapp-1988.