Hartford Fire Insurance Co. v. MRT Micro, ASA
This text of 841 So. 2d 675 (Hartford Fire Insurance Co. v. MRT Micro, ASA) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
It is undisputed that no notice was given to the sureties, Hartford Fire Insurance Company and National Surety Corporation, and that judgment should not have been entered against them.
We, therefore, reverse and remand for entry of an amended final judgment omitting paragraph three and all other references to the sureties, and without prejudice to any relief that may subsequently be afforded pursuant to rule 1.625, Florida Rules of Civil Procedure.
All other issues raised on appeal are moot. As to MRT Micro, ASA, the judgment shall remain in full force and effect.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
841 So. 2d 675, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 4809, 2003 WL 1824943, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hartford-fire-insurance-co-v-mrt-micro-asa-fladistctapp-2003.