Hartford Fire Department v. Commission On Human Rights & Opportunities ex rel. Pribyson
This text of 684 A.2d 744 (Hartford Fire Department v. Commission On Human Rights & Opportunities ex rel. Pribyson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut Appellate Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The parties concede, and we agree, that a finding of fact is necessary, i.e., a determination as to when the notice of final decision by the commission on human rights and opportunities was mailed. The resolution of that factual claim falls within the province of the trial court; we, as an appellate court, may not act as fact finders on claims not decided at the trial level. Connecticut National Bank v. Giacomi, 233 Conn. 304, 333, 659 A.2d 1166 (1995).
The judgment is reversed and the case is remanded for a determination of the timeliness of the appeal in light of Ann Howard’s Apricots Restaurant, Inc. v. Commission on Human Rights & Opportunities, 237 [667]*667Conn. 209, 676 A.2d 844 (1996);1 in the event that the trial court determines that the administrative appeal is timely in light of Ann Howard's Apricots Restaurant, Inc., the court shall resolve the issues on the merits; in the event that the appeal is not timely, the matter should be dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
684 A.2d 744, 43 Conn. App. 666, 1996 Conn. App. LEXIS 563, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hartford-fire-department-v-commission-on-human-rights-opportunities-ex-connappct-1996.