Hartford Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Tucker

565 A.2d 557, 20 Conn. App. 804, 1989 Conn. App. LEXIS 346

Opinion

Per Curiam.

These appeals came before this court where the named defendant, Stanley Tucker, failed to appear for oral argument.

Because of Tucker’s failure to appear, and with the acquiescence of other counsel in attendance, we will decide this case on the record and briefs.

Our review of same and of those issues properly before us reveals that the named defendant’s claims of error are without merit.

Accordingly, as to each appeal:

There is no error.