Hartford Equities Inc v. County of Clinton
This text of Hartford Equities Inc v. County of Clinton (Hartford Equities Inc v. County of Clinton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan
April 28, 2014 Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice
148430 Michael F. Cavanagh Stephen J. Markman Mary Beth Kelly Brian K. Zahra Bridget M. McCormack HARTFORD EQUITIES, INC., DALE David F. Viviano, HOPPES, KAREN A. HOPPES, GREGORY Justices HUHN, and GEOFFREY HUHN, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v SC: 148430 COA: 313443 Clinton CC: 00-009158-CZ COUNTY OF CLINTON, Defendant-Appellee, and DURGA, L.L.C., and KUMAR VEMULAPALLI, Respondents-Appellants.
_________________________________________/
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the November 26, 2013 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. April 28, 2014 t0421 Clerk
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Hartford Equities Inc v. County of Clinton, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hartford-equities-inc-v-county-of-clinton-mich-2014.