Hartford Casualty Insurance v. Litchfield Mutual Fire Insurance

845 A.2d 414, 268 Conn. 913, 2004 Conn. LEXIS 134
CourtSupreme Court of Connecticut
DecidedMarch 16, 2004
DocketSC 17147
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 845 A.2d 414 (Hartford Casualty Insurance v. Litchfield Mutual Fire Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hartford Casualty Insurance v. Litchfield Mutual Fire Insurance, 845 A.2d 414, 268 Conn. 913, 2004 Conn. LEXIS 134 (Colo. 2004).

Opinion

The plaintiffs’ cross petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 80 Conn. App. 364 (AC 23896), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the defendant had no duty to defend the insured Mitch Wylie?”

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hartford Casualty Insurance v. Litchfield Mutual Fire Insurance
876 A.2d 1139 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 2005)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
845 A.2d 414, 268 Conn. 913, 2004 Conn. LEXIS 134, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hartford-casualty-insurance-v-litchfield-mutual-fire-insurance-conn-2004.