Hartford Casualty Insurance v. Intrastate Construction Corp.

Eleventh Circuit

Hartford Casualty Insurance v. Intrastate Construction Corp.

447 F. App'x 128

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·Decided November 22, 2011·No. No. 11-10842·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Appellants argue, on this interlocutory appeal, that the district court abused its discretion in granting Appellee’s request for a preliminary injunction.

After a thorough review of the briefs, record, and having had the benefit of oral argument, we conclude the district court did not abuse its discretion in granting the preliminary injunction. We do not decide the ultimate issue of whether Appellee will prevail.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Appellants argue, on this interlocutory appeal, that the district court abused its discretion in granting Appellee’s request for a preliminary injunction.

After a thorough review of the briefs, record, and having had the benefit of oral argument, we conclude the district court did not abuse its discretion in granting the preliminary injunction. We do not decide the ultimate issue of whether Appellee will prevail.

AFFIRMED.

Hartford Casualty Insurance v. Intrastate Construction Corp., 447 F. App'x 128 (11th Cir. 2011).

Pincite

447 F. App'x 128 (Hartford Casualty Insurance v. Intrastate Construction Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.