Hartford Casualty Insurance v. Intrastate Construction Corp.

Eleventh Circuit

Hartford Casualty Insurance v. Intrastate Construction Corp.

447 F. App'x 128

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

DecidedNovember 22, 2011

DocketNo. 11-10842

StatusPublished

This text of 447 F. App'x 128 (Hartford Casualty Insurance v. Intrastate Construction Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hartford Casualty Insurance v. Intrastate Construction Corp., 447 F. App'x 128 (11th Cir. 2011).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Appellants argue, on this interlocutory appeal, that the district court abused its discretion in granting Appellee’s request for a preliminary injunction.

After a thorough review of the briefs, record, and having had the benefit of oral argument, we conclude the district court did not abuse its discretion in granting the preliminary injunction. We do not decide the ultimate issue of whether Appellee will prevail.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Appellants argue, on this interlocutory appeal, that the district court abused its discretion in granting Appellee’s request for a preliminary injunction.

After a thorough review of the briefs, record, and having had the benefit of oral argument, we conclude the district court did not abuse its discretion in granting the preliminary injunction. We do not decide the ultimate issue of whether Appellee will prevail.

AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

447 F. App'x 128, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hartford-casualty-insurance-v-intrastate-construction-corp-ca11-2011.