Hartford Automobile Finance Co. v. Capitol Construction Co.

7 Conn. Super. Ct. 386, 7 Conn. Supp. 386, 1939 Conn. Super. LEXIS 128
CourtConnecticut Superior Court
DecidedNovember 14, 1939
DocketFile 30787
StatusPublished

This text of 7 Conn. Super. Ct. 386 (Hartford Automobile Finance Co. v. Capitol Construction Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut Superior Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hartford Automobile Finance Co. v. Capitol Construction Co., 7 Conn. Super. Ct. 386, 7 Conn. Supp. 386, 1939 Conn. Super. LEXIS 128 (Colo. Ct. App. 1939).

Opinion

BOOTH, J.

The above entitled case is an action to foreclose a mortgage upon land described in the complaint as being Lot No. 47 on a map of the Waverly Tract, so'called, on file in the town clerk’s office in the Town of West Hartford. The action went into judgment on June 4, 1926, and in preparing *387 the judgment file therein the above map was described as being' one prepared by Spencer & Washburn, Engineers, dated May, 1925.

It now appears that there is no such map on file in such town clerk’s office but that there is one prepared by Spencer &’ Washburn, Engineers, bearing date of May, 1923. The plain' tiff seeks to have the judgment file of June 4, 1926, corrected' by substituting for the description of the map as appears in the judgment file a true description thereof. The ground of the plaintiff’s claim is that the former description is a typographical or clerical error. And it is obvious that such is the fact.

While a court has no jurisdiction over its judgments after the term in which they are rendered has passed, a mere clerical error in a judgment file may be corrected, even if the correction is made after adjournment of the session at which the case was tried. Pelton vs. Goldberg, 81 Conn. 280.

In view of the foregoing the motion as made is hereby-granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Pelton v. Goldberg
70 A. 1020 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1908)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
7 Conn. Super. Ct. 386, 7 Conn. Supp. 386, 1939 Conn. Super. LEXIS 128, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hartford-automobile-finance-co-v-capitol-construction-co-connsuperct-1939.