Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. O'Quinn
180 So. 2d 878, 1965 La. App. LEXIS 3786
This text of 180 So. 2d 878 (Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. O'Quinn) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. O'Quinn, 180 So. 2d 878, 1965 La. App. LEXIS 3786 (La. Ct. App. 1965).
Opinion
For the reasons this day assigned in the case entitled “Mrs. Hazel Cinquemano vs. Arthur M. O’Quinn, et al”, 180 So.2d 873, bearing Docket No. 6484 on the Docket of this Court, the Judgment herein appealed from is hereby affirmed.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cinquemano v. O'Quinn
180 So. 2d 873 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1965)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
180 So. 2d 878, 1965 La. App. LEXIS 3786, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hartford-accident-indemnity-co-v-oquinn-lactapp-1965.