Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. Michigan Mutual Insurance
95 A.D.2d 738, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 18635
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. Michigan Mutual Insurance. Read the opinion of the Court — 93 A.D.2d 337 →
Opinion
— Motion, insofar as it seeks reargument denied; and insofar as it seeks leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals, the motion is granted and this court certifies the following question: “Was the order of this court, which modified the order of the Supreme Court, properly made?” Concur — Kupferman, J. P., Asch, Silverman, Bloom and Kassal, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. Michigan Mutual Insurance, 95 A.D.2d 738, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 18635 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1983).
95 A.D.2d 738 (Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. Michigan Mutual Insurance) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.