Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. Marley Industries Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. Marley Industries Corp.

245 A.D.2d 544, 666 N.Y.S.2d 503, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13384

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 29, 1997

StatusPublished

This text of 245 A.D.2d 544 (Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. Marley Industries Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. Marley Industries Corp., 245 A.D.2d 544, 666 N.Y.S.2d 503, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13384 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1997).

Pincite

Opinion

—Appeal by the defendant Harry Zucker and purported appeal by the defendant Mildred Zucker from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Coppola, J.), entered November 12, 1996.

Ordered that the purported appeal by Mildred Zucker is dismissed on the ground that she did not file a notice of appeal; and it is further,

Ordered that on the appeal of the defendant Harry Zucker the order is affirmed, for reasons stated by Justice Coppola at the Supreme Court; and it is further,

Ordered that the respondent is awarded one bill of costs payable by the defendant Harry Zucker. Miller, J. P., Ritter, Sullivan, Santucci and McGinity, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Appeal by the defendant Harry Zucker and purported appeal by the defendant Mildred Zucker from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Coppola, J.), entered November 12, 1996.

Ordered that the purported appeal by Mildred Zucker is dismissed on the ground that she did not file a notice of appeal; and it is further,

Ordered that on the appeal of the defendant Harry Zucker the order is affirmed, for reasons stated by Justice Coppola at the Supreme Court; and it is further,

Ordered that the respondent is awarded one bill of costs payable by the defendant Harry Zucker. Miller, J. P., Ritter, Sullivan, Santucci and McGinity, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

245 A.D.2d 544, 666 N.Y.S.2d 503, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13384, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hartford-accident-indemnity-co-v-marley-industries-corp-nyappdiv-1997.