Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. Gore
This text of 265 S.E.2d 370 (Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. Gore) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appellant asserts that the trial court erred in affirming the award of the Board of Workers’ Compensation. The award was based upon a finding that Gary Allen Gore committed suicide as a result of work-related injuries. Appellant does not contend that an award cannot be based upon suicide. See McDonald v. Atlantic Steel Co., 133 Ga. App. 157 (210 SE2d 344) (1974). Rather, appellant contends that the Board’s finding of suicide was based solely upon incompetent evidence. We reject this contention. The evidence of record clearly authorized a finding that appellant committed suicide. Since there was evidence in support of the Board’s finding, the judgment must be affirmed. Rucker v. Universal Memorial Co., 145 Ga. App. 724 (244 SE2d 584) (1978).
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
265 S.E.2d 370, 153 Ga. App. 448, 1980 Ga. App. LEXIS 1845, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hartford-accident-indemnity-co-v-gore-gactapp-1980.