Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. Costal Dry Dock & Repair Corp.
467 N.E.2d 894, 62 N.Y.2d 924, 479 N.Y.S.2d 10, 1984 N.Y. LEXIS 4448
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.4), order affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in the memorandum at the Appellate Division (97 AD2d 724).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. Costal Dry Dock & Repair Corp., 467 N.E.2d 894, 62 N.Y.2d 924, 479 N.Y.S.2d 10, 1984 N.Y. LEXIS 4448 (N.Y. 1984).
467 N.E.2d 894 (Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. Costal Dry Dock & Repair Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Commissioners of the State Insurance Fund v. Photocircuits Corp.
2 Misc. 3d 300 (New York Supreme Court, 2003)
Commissioners of State Insurance Fund v. J.D.G.S. Corp.
253 A.D.2d 368 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)
Insurance Co. of Greater New York v. Glen Haven Residential Health Care Facility Inc.
253 A.D.2d 378 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)
Commissioners of the State Insurance Fund v. Gem Steel Erectors Inc.
237 A.D.2d 213 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)
Gordon v. Goldman Bros.
130 A.D.2d 457 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1987)
Illumalights Manufacturing, Inc. v. Neo-Ray Products, Inc.
124 A.D.2d 644 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1986)