Hartford Accident & Indem. Co. v. Casalino
This text of 95 N.E.2d 209 (Hartford Accident & Indem. Co. v. Casalino) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company, Appellant,
v.
Pauline Casalino, Respondent.
Court of Appeals of the State of New York.
Charles R. McNamee, Harry Salvan and Stewart Maurice for appellant.
Evelyn Baker Richman, George F. Blake and Jesse S. Richman for Excise Bond Underwriters and others, amici curiæ, in support of appellant's position.
Samuel Jacobs for respondent.
Concur: LOUGHRAN, Ch. J., LEWIS, CONWAY, DESMOND, DYE, FULD and FROESSEL, JJ. [See 302 N.Y. 560.]
Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
95 N.E.2d 209, 301 N.Y. 715, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hartford-accident-indem-co-v-casalino-ny-1950.