Hartert v. Snake River Valley Irrigation District
This text of 277 P. 429 (Hartert v. Snake River Valley Irrigation District) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Idaho Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Action by appellant to recover for services alleged to have been rendered as broker in the sale of certain bonds issued by respondent. Demurrer to the complaint was sustained and. the action dismissed for failure of appellant to plead further. It is contended here that the trial court erred in sustaining the demurrer and in entering judgment of dismissal based upon the proposition that appellant’s complaint did not state a cause of action.
We are of the opinion that respondent was not authorized to employ an agent for the purposes set out by appellant or to pay a commission for the sale of its bonds. (Lucas v. City of Nampa, 41 Ida. 35, 238 Pac. 288; Smith v. Los Angeles County, 99 Cal. 628, 34 Pac. 439; Theis v. Board of County Commrs., 22 Okl. 333, 97 Pac. 973.) The court did not err in sustaining the demurrer to the complaint.
Judgment affirmed. Costs to respondent.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
277 P. 429, 47 Idaho 535, 1929 Ida. LEXIS 151, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hartert-v-snake-river-valley-irrigation-district-idaho-1929.