Harter v. Harter

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Harter v. Harter

51 A.D.2d 536, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10764

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 12, 1976

StatusPublished

This text of 51 A.D.2d 536 (Harter v. Harter) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Harter v. Harter, 51 A.D.2d 536, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10764 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1976).

Pincite

Opinion

The respective attorneys for the parties on this appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, entered August 11, 1975, have agreed, after a conference held in this court before Mr. Justice Gittleson on December 17, 1975, that the appeal be withdrawn, and they thereupon signed a stipulation to such effect, which stipulation includes certain other provisions. In accordance with the foregoing, the appeal is deemed withdrawn, without costs; and it is ordered that the case proceed to trial on January 19, 1976, upon the filing of a note of issue and a statement of readiness; and that the trial court shall consider the question of plaintiff’s counsel fees. Gulotta, P. J., Hopkins, Martuscello, Latham and Cohalan, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The respective attorneys for the parties on this appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, entered August 11, 1975, have agreed, after a conference held in this court before Mr. Justice Gittleson on December 17, 1975, that the appeal be withdrawn, and they thereupon signed a stipulation to such effect, which stipulation includes certain other provisions. In accordance with the foregoing, the appeal is deemed withdrawn, without costs; and it is ordered that the case proceed to trial on January 19, 1976, upon the filing of a note of issue and a statement of readiness; and that the trial court shall consider the question of plaintiff’s counsel fees. Gulotta, P. J., Hopkins, Martuscello, Latham and Cohalan, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

51 A.D.2d 536, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10764, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harter-v-harter-nyappdiv-1976.