Hartell v. T. H. Simonson & Son Co.

174 A.D. 910

Opinion

Motion to require appellant to file new undertaking granted, bond to be approved by a justice of the Supreme Court at Special Term. Order to be settled on notice. Present—Clarke, P. J., Scott, Dowling, Smith and Page, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hartell v. T. H. Simonson & Son Co., 174 A.D. 910 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1916).

174 A.D. 910 (Hartell v. T. H. Simonson & Son Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.