Harte v. Sturtevant
This text of 93 S.E. 530 (Harte v. Sturtevant) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1. The Civil Code (1910), § 5185, requires that before any writ of certiorari shall issue, the party applying for it shall give bond “and shall also produce a certificate from the officer whose decision or judgment is the subject-matter of complaint that all costs which have accrued on the trial below have been paid.”
2. Section 18 of the act creating the municipal court of Savannah (Georgia Laws, 1915, p. 124) is broad enough to authorize the clerk of that court to give a certificate that all costs which have accrued on the trial below have been paid; and the judge of the superior court did not err in refusing to dismiss the petition for certiorari because such a certificate had not been made by the officer whose decision was complained of.
3. Even if so much of the act creating the municipal court of Savannah as confers upon the clerk the power to make the certificate with reference to the payment of costs which have accrued upon the trial of a case in that court is a special law, and therefore unconstitutional because in conflict with code-section 5185, supra, there are no sufficient pleadings to require the Court of Appeals to certify the case to the Supreme Court.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
93 S.E. 530, 20 Ga. App. 822, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 1108, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harte-v-sturtevant-gactapp-1917.