Hartage v. State

785 So. 2d 636, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 5812, 2001 WL 456508
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 2, 2001·No. No. 4D01-1078·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed, without prejudice to refile a legally sufficient motion filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800. See Baker v. State, 714 So.2d 1167, 1167 n. 1 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998) (explaining that “[t]he allegations required by [State v.] Mancino[, 714 So.2d 429 (Fla.1988)] at a minimum would have to address how and where the record demonstrates entitlement to relief.”).

POLEN, KLEIN and STEVENSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hartage v. State, 785 So. 2d 636, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 5812, 2001 WL 456508 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).

785 So. 2d 636 (Hartage v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Baker v. State
714 So. 2d 1167 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1998)
State v. Mancino
714 So. 2d 429 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1998)