Hartage v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Hartage v. State

785 So. 2d 636, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 5812, 2001 WL 456508

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMay 2, 2001

DocketNo. 4D01-1078

StatusPublished

This text of 785 So. 2d 636 (Hartage v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hartage v. State, 785 So. 2d 636, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 5812, 2001 WL 456508 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed, without prejudice to refile a legally sufficient motion filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800. See Baker v. State, 714 So.2d 1167, 1167 n. 1 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998) (explaining that “[t]he allegations required by [State v.] Mancino[, 714 So.2d 429 (Fla.1988)] at a minimum would have to address how and where the record demonstrates entitlement to relief.”).

POLEN, KLEIN and STEVENSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed, without prejudice to refile a legally sufficient motion filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800. See Baker v. State, 714 So.2d 1167, 1167 n. 1 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998) (explaining that “[t]he allegations required by [State v.] Mancino[, 714 So.2d 429 (Fla.1988)] at a minimum would have to address how and where the record demonstrates entitlement to relief.”).

POLEN, KLEIN and STEVENSON, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

785 So. 2d 636, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 5812, 2001 WL 456508, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hartage-v-state-fladistctapp-2001.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack