Hart v. Wright

235 Mass. 243
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court·Decided March 3, 1920·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

By the Court.

This is an action of tort wherein the plaintiff seeks to recover compensation for personal injuries sustained by her while a traveller upon a highway, by slipping upon natural ice on the sidewalk adjacent to land owned by the defendant. There was no evidence of artificial collection of water by spout or otherwise. The record utterly fails to disclose any ground of liability. This is equally so, even if it be assumed that the defendant violated some ordinance in failing to remove the ice or to render walking over it safe by scattering ashes, sand or other material. The case is covered by the authority of numerous decisions. Kirby v. Boylston Market Association, 14 Gray, 249, 252. Sanborn v. McKeagney, 229 Mass. 300, and cases collected.

Exceptions overruled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hart v. Wright, 235 Mass. 243 (Mass. 1920).

235 Mass. 243 (Hart v. Wright) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Cooper v. Braver, Healey & Co.
67 N.E.2d 657 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1946)
Crafts v. McCobb
21 N.E.2d 226 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1939)
Mahoney v. Perreault
175 N.E. 467 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1931)
Graham v. Andrews
173 N.E. 240 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1930)
Bailey v. Blacker
165 N.E. 699 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1929)
Smith v. Locke Coal Co.
164 N.E. 381 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1929)
Pickett v. Waldorf System, Inc.
136 N.E. 64 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1922)