Hart v. Wright
This text of 235 Mass. 243 (Hart v. Wright) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This is an action of tort wherein the plaintiff seeks to recover compensation for personal injuries sustained by her while a traveller upon a highway, by slipping upon natural ice on the sidewalk adjacent to land owned by the defendant. There was no evidence of artificial collection of water by spout or otherwise. The record utterly fails to disclose any ground of liability. This is equally so, even if it be assumed that the defendant violated some ordinance in failing to remove the ice or to render walking over it safe by scattering ashes, sand or other material. The case is covered by the authority of numerous decisions. Kirby v. Boylston Market Association, 14 Gray, 249, 252. Sanborn v. McKeagney, 229 Mass. 300, and cases collected.
Exceptions overruled.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
235 Mass. 243, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hart-v-wright-mass-1920.