Hart v. Wrench

1 Del. Cas. 574
CourtSupreme Court of Delaware
DecidedOctober 15, 1818
StatusPublished

This text of 1 Del. Cas. 574 (Hart v. Wrench) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Delaware primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hart v. Wrench, 1 Del. Cas. 574 (Del. 1818).

Opinion

Johns, C. J.

Is this cause to be tried by the Court alone or by the Court and a jury? And can we hear any testimony that was not before the court below?

Hall. Appellate jurisdiction may order a question of fact to be tried by a jury. 1 Harr.Ch.Pr. 455. The Court must hear evidence, as that below was not in writing. On error from Common Pleas in exactly such a case, saving that was petition for freedom, the Court of Errors and Appeals held, after a term taken to consider, that they might hear evidence, but made an order that in future the testimony below should be reduced to writing.

The Court alone should try the appeal, and we do not wish to set a different precedent. The court below not having put the testimony before it in writing, we must hear the witnesses.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 Del. Cas. 574, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hart-v-wrench-del-1818.