Hart v. Wood

6 Wend. 558
CourtNew York Supreme Court
DecidedSeptember 7, 1831
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 6 Wend. 558 (Hart v. Wood) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hart v. Wood, 6 Wend. 558 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1831).

Opinion

By the Court,

Sutherland, J.

The defendant is entitled to a rule for costs. He cannot move alone for judgment as in case of nonsuit, there being other defendants; but it is right that he should have his costs for attending at the circuit. When this motion was made at a previous day, we held that where there are several defendants, and only one of them [559]*559asks for costs against the plaintiff, for not proceeding to trial pursuant to notice, that the motion ought not to be granted, unless the party had obtained the assent of his co-defendants for him to apply to the court separately, or they had refused to unite with him in the application. The defendant now having obtained the required assent, no objection is perceived to granting the motion.

Motion granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Dauchy v. Allen
3 How. Pr. 210 (New York Supreme Court, 1848)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
6 Wend. 558, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hart-v-wood-nysupct-1831.