Hart v. . Williams

77 N.C. 426
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedJune 5, 1877
StatusPublished
Cited by14 cases

This text of 77 N.C. 426 (Hart v. . Williams) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hart v. . Williams, 77 N.C. 426 (N.C. 1877).

Opinion

ByNüm J.

1. By reading the second clause of the will as the first, the meaning of the testator more plainly appears, though it is apparent as it now stands. Taking the second clause first, the substance and effect of the will is; “I will that my executor pay to Alfred Williams, freedman, two hundred and fifty dollars. I will the rest of my estate both real and personal to Henry Plart, &c.”

Taking the will as it 'is 'written, the sum of two hundred and fifty dollars directed to be paid to Alfred Williams, is *428 expressly excepted from the operation of the devise and bequest to Henry Hart in trust for the widow for life and remainder over. After the payment of the debts of the testator, this legacy to Alfred is to be first paid, and is the first charge upon the estate, real and personal, devised and bequeathed to Hart in trust.

2. The rule is that pecuniary legacies bear interest from one year after the' death of the testator. Where they appear to be given for the support and maintenance of the legatee, they bear interest from the death of the testator. Swann v. Swann, 5 Jones Eq. 297; McWilliams v. Faulcon, 6 Jones Eq. 235.

No error.

Per Curiam. Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

First Union National Bank v. Melvin
130 S.E.2d 387 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1963)
FIRST UNION NATIONAL BANK OF NC v. Melvin
130 S.E.2d 387 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1963)
Heyer v. . Bulluck
186 S.E. 356 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1936)
Shepard v. . Bryan
143 S.E. 835 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1928)
Lacey v. Collins
112 N.W. 101 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1907)
Brooks v. Brooks
65 Ill. App. 326 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1896)
Moore v. . Pullen
21 S.E. 195 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1895)
Thorn v. . Garner
21 N.E. 149 (New York Court of Appeals, 1889)
Tyson v. . Tyson
6 S.E. 707 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1888)
Worth v. . Worth
95 N.C. 239 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1886)
Stradley v. . King
84 N.C. 635 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1881)
McWilliams v. . Falcon
59 N.C. 235 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1861)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
77 N.C. 426, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hart-v-williams-nc-1877.