Hart v. Wilder

The Superior Court of New York City

Hart v. Wilder

27 Jones & S. 582, 59 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 582

The Superior Court of New York City·Decided March 9, 1891·Published

Opinion

The question involved was as‘ to the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain plaintiff’s cause of action. The Court (per- Curiam) held, that as the trial judge had superior opportunities for the determination of serious doubt upon conflicting evidence some deference should be accorded to-it, and that such deference sufficed to impel an affirmance of the judgment, and affirmed the judgment, with costs. -

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The question involved was as‘ to the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain plaintiff’s cause of action. The Court (per- Curiam) held, that as the trial judge had superior opportunities for the determination of serious doubt upon conflicting evidence some deference should be accorded to-it, and that such deference sufficed to impel an affirmance of the judgment, and affirmed the judgment, with costs. -

Hart v. Wilder, 27 Jones & S. 582, 59 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 582 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1891).

Pincite

27 Jones & S. 582 (Hart v. Wilder) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.