Hart v. Ware
8 Tex. 115
Opinion
The record in this ease discloses no ruling of the court upon any question of law. The sole question is whether the verdict of the jury was warranted by the evidence. There was no motion for a new trial; and it is tlie settled law of the court that where there was no motion for a new trial the judgment will not be reversed on the ground that tho verdict was not warranted by the evidence. The judgment must therefore be affirmed.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hart v. Ware, 8 Tex. 115 (Tex. 1852).
8 Tex. 115 (Hart v. Ware) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Ellis v. National City Bank of Waco
94 S.W. 437 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1906)
International & Great Northern Railway Co. v. Douglas
27 S.W. 793 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1894)
Galbraith v. Townsend
20 S.W. 943 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1892)
Putnam v. Putnam
24 P. 320 (Arizona Supreme Court, 1890)
Jacobs v. Hawkins
63 Tex. 1 (Texas Supreme Court, 1884)
Sears v. Green
1 Posey 727 (Texas Commission of Appeals, 1880)