Hart v. United States

Second Circuit

Hart v. United States

227 F. 1018, 141 C.C.A. 666, 1915 U.S. App. LEXIS 2392

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Hart v. United States. Read the opinion of the Court — 240 F. 911 →

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·Decided October 12, 1915·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The delay in the presentation of this cause has resulted from the government’s failure to propose amendments to the proposed bill of exceptions. Had it been reasonably expeditious, the cause could have been argued before the adjournment in June last. Under these circumstances we think the application of plaintiff in error should be granted, to the extent of reducing the amount of bail to $10,000. So ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The delay in the presentation of this cause has resulted from the government’s failure to propose amendments to the proposed bill of exceptions. Had it been reasonably expeditious, the cause could have been argued before the adjournment in June last. Under these circumstances we think the application of plaintiff in error should be granted, to the extent of reducing the amount of bail to $10,000. So ordered.

Hart v. United States, 227 F. 1018, 141 C.C.A. 666, 1915 U.S. App. LEXIS 2392 (2d Cir. 1915).

Pincite

227 F. 1018 (Hart v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.