Hart v. State
177 S.W. 1175, 77 Tex. Crim. 267
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Hart v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 67 Tex. Crim. 497 →
Opinion
Appellant was prosecuted and convicted of violating the prohibition law in Johnson County, Texas, from which judgment he prosecutes this appeal, the only assignment of error being that the evidence is insufficient to support the verdict. S. Gordón swears positively to purchasing a bottle of whisky from appellant, and says he paid him for it. It is true appellant denies making the sale, hut this was a question for the jury.
The judgment is affirmed.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hart v. State, 177 S.W. 1175, 77 Tex. Crim. 267 (Tex. 1915).
177 S.W. 1175 (Hart v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.