Hart v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Hart v. State

1921 OK CR 80, 200 P. 551, 19 Okla. Crim. 405, 1921 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 99

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma·Decided May 12, 1921·No. No. A-3622.·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

L. B. Hart, plaintiff in error, was, on the 19th day of May, 1919, in the county court of Kay county, convicted of having had in his possession on February 9, 1917,. certain intoxicating liquor, with the unlawful intent of disposing thereof, and his punishment was fixed at 120 days in jail and a fine of $100.

To reverse this judgment and sentence, he appeals.

*406 The points urged in this ease are fully covered by the questions just decided by this court in the case of Lappy v. State, 19 Okla. Cr. 434, 200 Pac. 550; and for the reasons there stated, applicable to this case, the judgment below is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

L. B. Hart, plaintiff in error, was, on the 19th day of May, 1919, in the county court of Kay county, convicted of having had in his possession on February 9, 1917,. certain intoxicating liquor, with the unlawful intent of disposing thereof, and his punishment was fixed at 120 days in jail and a fine of $100.

To reverse this judgment and sentence, he appeals.

*406 The points urged in this ease are fully covered by the questions just decided by this court in the case of Lappy v. State, 19 Okla. Cr. 434, 200 Pac. 550; and for the reasons there stated, applicable to this case, the judgment below is affirmed.

Hart v. State, 1921 OK CR 80, 200 P. 551, 19 Okla. Crim. 405, 1921 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 99 (Okla. Ct. App. 1921).

Pincite

1921 OK CR 80 (Hart v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related