Hart v. State
2010 Ohio 4985, 936 N.E.2d 497, 127 Ohio St. 3d 72
Opinion
{¶ 1} The discretionary appeal is accepted on Proposition of Law No. III.
{¶ 2} The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed as to that portion of the judgment that rejected a constitutional challenge to the Adam Walsh Act on separation-of-powers grounds on the authority of State v. Bodyke, 126 Ohio St.3d 266, 2010-Ohio-2424, 933 N.E.2d 753, and the cause is remanded to the trial court for further proceedings, if any, necessitated by State v. Bodyke.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hart v. State, 2010 Ohio 4985, 936 N.E.2d 497, 127 Ohio St. 3d 72 (Ohio 2010).
2010 Ohio 4985 (Hart v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Bodyke
2010 Ohio 2424 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2010)