Hart v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Hart v. State

892 S.W.2d 773, 1995 Mo. App. LEXIS 69, 1995 WL 15474

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedJanuary 17, 1995

DocketNo. 65944

StatusPublished

This text of 892 S.W.2d 773 (Hart v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hart v. State, 892 S.W.2d 773, 1995 Mo. App. LEXIS 69, 1995 WL 15474 (Mo. Ct. App. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant appeals the denial, without an evi-dentiary hearing, of his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief. We affirm. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous, and an extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant appeals the denial, without an evi-dentiary hearing, of his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief. We affirm. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous, and an extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

892 S.W.2d 773, 1995 Mo. App. LEXIS 69, 1995 WL 15474, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hart-v-state-moctapp-1995.