Hart v. State

127 S.E. 302, 33 Ga. App. 613, 1925 Ga. App. LEXIS 644
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedMarch 27, 1925
Docket16285
StatusPublished

This text of 127 S.E. 302 (Hart v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hart v. State, 127 S.E. 302, 33 Ga. App. 613, 1925 Ga. App. LEXIS 644 (Ga. Ct. App. 1925).

Opinion

Broyles, C. J.

The verdict was demanded by the evidence, and none of the grounds of the amendment to the motion for a new trial requires a reversal of the judgment refusing a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Lulce and Bloodworth, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
127 S.E. 302, 33 Ga. App. 613, 1925 Ga. App. LEXIS 644, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hart-v-state-gactapp-1925.