Hart v. State

61 S.E. 511, 4 Ga. App. 341, 1908 Ga. App. LEXIS 292

Opinion

Russell, J.

No error of law is assigned; the evidence authorized the conviction of the defendant, and the trial judge did not err in overruling the motion for new trial, based solely upon the general grounds; for the reason that these grounds are insufficient to raise any question as to the admissibility of the evidence adduced upon the trial.

Judgment affirmed.