Hart v. State

421 So. 2d 2, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 28122
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 18, 1982·No. No. 81-1231·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. We believe the trial court acted correctly in denying the motion to suppress; State v. Richards, 388 So.2d 573 (Fla. 4th DCA 1980), cert. denied 397 So.2d 778 (Fla.1981), 102 S.Ct. 359; in submitting the issue of constructive possession to the jury; Winchell v. State, 362 So.2d 992 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978); in denying the motions to dismiss and suppress; Frisbie v. Collins, 342 U.S. 519, 72 S.Ct. 509, 96 L.Ed. 541 (1952); in instructing the jury on constructive possession; Lacy v. State, 387 So.2d 561 (Fla. 4th DCA 1980); and in upholding the constitutionality of the drug trafficking statute; State v. Benitez, 395 So.2d 514 (Fla.1981).

[3] DOWNEY, ANSTEAD and BERANEK, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hart v. State, 421 So. 2d 2, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 28122 (Fla. Ct. App. 1982).

421 So. 2d 2 (Hart v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Frisbie v. Collins
342 U.S. 519 (Supreme Court, 1952)
State v. Richards
388 So. 2d 573 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1980)
State v. Benitez
395 So. 2d 514 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1981)
Lacy v. State
387 So. 2d 561 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1980)
Winchell v. State
362 So. 2d 992 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1978)